une réctification sur l'O.T.A.N.

[Devo]

Bedeur is our frenchman he will translate better later. Here's what I came up with.



The post is entitles: "a correction on NATO"

I listened this morning on France Inter radio waves (or int.) NATO can carry out strikes on Libya or that it looks good, ie outside of combat zones, for such as cities or it does is that Libyan revolutionary (for example, or the Egyptian border in the desert south) or to shoot at civilians ... Without the approval of the country that gave him permission, so these countries bear the political side to this task and in particular (France, UK and USA). It seems worth mentioning that political decisions are not within NATO but only implemented on the ground, these policy decisions at the state (Fr, GB, USA) and in accordance with resolutions UN, NATO is an instrument and can not in any way, replace the constituent states of this organization, at the political level. And consequently, NATO can not do anything without the approval of the policy states that make up this organization. Everyone has in mind, the course of the first Gulf War, where the White House of Bush father was the political side without intervening on the ground that belonged to General Schwarskopf completely to invade Iraq and the political (which is also the lawyer who respects international law and therefore the UN resolutions) in Washington forbade him to do this incursion and the general who commanded the coalition has not done well in another time for General MacArthur . So NATO is running the task on the ground (and all the ground) but with a master behind, namely the policies of Member States. RE14HGMT18

More or less I think he's attempting to point out the fallacies of the real NATO. And with his internet postings being largely centered around political sites and forums in which he tries to get his HP Pavilion 5000 fixed, I strongly think he's barking up the wrong tree. We aren't affiliated with the ground forces sir, we just play the game. Try it out (cybernations.net)